<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: IT Governance Standards: COBIT, ISO17799/27001, ITIL and PMBOK &#8211; Part 4</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/10/governance-standards-cobit-iso1779927001-itil-and-pmbok-%e2%80%93-part-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/10/governance-standards-cobit-iso1779927001-itil-and-pmbok-%e2%80%93-part-4/</link>
	<description>After much frustration, it seems DEFAULT is the way to go...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:45:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CleverWorkarounds &#187; &#34;Ain&#8217;t it cool?&#34; - Integrating SharePoint and real-time performance data - Part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/10/governance-standards-cobit-iso1779927001-itil-and-pmbok-%e2%80%93-part-4/comment-page-1/#comment-1548</link>
		<dc:creator>CleverWorkarounds &#187; &#34;Ain&#8217;t it cool?&#34; - Integrating SharePoint and real-time performance data - Part 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Aug 2008 06:05:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/10/governance-standards-cobit-iso1779927001-itil-and-pmbok-%e2%80%93-part-4/#comment-1548</guid>
		<description>[...] and efficient, as well as capture knowledge and documentation. I was influenced considerably by ISO17799 as it was called back then, especially in the area of asset management. I liked the use of the term [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and efficient, as well as capture knowledge and documentation. I was influenced considerably by ISO17799 as it was called back then, especially in the area of asset management. I liked the use of the term [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

