<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Disk and I/O Sizing for MOSS2007 &#8211; Part 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/</link>
	<description>After much frustration, it seems DEFAULT is the way to go...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 17:45:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sola Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5931</link>
		<dc:creator>Sola Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/#comment-5931</guid>
		<description>The microsoft tables referenced in your blog, where did you get them from?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The microsoft tables referenced in your blog, where did you get them from?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sola Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5929</link>
		<dc:creator>Sola Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:54:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/#comment-5929</guid>
		<description>using the formulas you used above, please advise on how you would go about with the following requirements:

user: 35000
concurrent user: 40%
Peak factor: 2:1
Business hours = 12.

When i followed the steps you used i got 1360 requests per seconds which i think doesn&#039;t make sense.

if my calculation is right, how many web servers, search servers would you recommend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>using the formulas you used above, please advise on how you would go about with the following requirements:</p>
<p>user: 35000<br />
concurrent user: 40%<br />
Peak factor: 2:1<br />
Business hours = 12.</p>
<p>When i followed the steps you used i got 1360 requests per seconds which i think doesn&#8217;t make sense.</p>
<p>if my calculation is right, how many web servers, search servers would you recommend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sola Noah</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-5920</link>
		<dc:creator>Sola Noah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:38:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/#comment-5920</guid>
		<description>This is an excellent job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is an excellent job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/comment-page-1/#comment-3899</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 01:45:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2007/10/17/disk-and-io-sizing-for-moss2007-part-2/#comment-3899</guid>
		<description>A very well reasoned and not overly ambiguous set of estimates. Good job! Whilst the figures themselves are obviously irrelevant to anyone else. The very fact I was able to forward this over to my managers, finally gave some perspective on my apparent inane ramblings over sizing servers! So many thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A very well reasoned and not overly ambiguous set of estimates. Good job! Whilst the figures themselves are obviously irrelevant to anyone else. The very fact I was able to forward this over to my managers, finally gave some perspective on my apparent inane ramblings over sizing servers! So many thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

