<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clever, very clever (but bad all the same)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/04/21/clever-very-clever-but-bad-all-the-same/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/04/21/clever-very-clever-but-bad-all-the-same/</link>
	<description>After much frustration, it seems DEFAULT is the way to go...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 11:20:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: CleverWorkarounds &#187; Good advice hidden in the Infrastructure Update</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/04/21/clever-very-clever-but-bad-all-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-1325</link>
		<dc:creator>CleverWorkarounds &#187; Good advice hidden in the Infrastructure Update</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:44:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/04/21/clever-very-clever-but-bad-all-the-same/#comment-1325</guid>
		<description>[...] For what it&#8217;s worth, I do not use the Network Service account either, as it is actually more risky than a low privileged domain or local user [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For what it&#8217;s worth, I do not use the Network Service account either, as it is actually more risky than a low privileged domain or local user [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/04/21/clever-very-clever-but-bad-all-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-414</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 14:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/04/21/clever-very-clever-but-bad-all-the-same/#comment-414</guid>
		<description>Yes right Matt, hence why I suggested this is more a WSS3 issue than it is MOSS 2007. There is no good reason why farm, ssp or web app accounts should need to run sharing the credentials of other windows services.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes right Matt, hence why I suggested this is more a WSS3 issue than it is MOSS 2007. There is no good reason why farm, ssp or web app accounts should need to run sharing the credentials of other windows services.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt</title>
		<link>http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/04/21/clever-very-clever-but-bad-all-the-same/comment-page-1/#comment-413</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 12:02:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cleverworkarounds.com/2008/04/21/clever-very-clever-but-bad-all-the-same/#comment-413</guid>
		<description>Very interesting and more than slightly alarming.  Thanks for the information.

If I&#039;m reading this correctly, though, if a MOSS farm was built with best practices and using dedictaed &quot;least privileged&quot; service accounts (from an AD domain), that farm should not be in danger, correct?  The highjacked service account would not be running more than one service...  Right?    I could be missing something...  Thanks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting and more than slightly alarming.  Thanks for the information.</p>
<p>If I&#8217;m reading this correctly, though, if a MOSS farm was built with best practices and using dedictaed &#8220;least privileged&#8221; service accounts (from an AD domain), that farm should not be in danger, correct?  The highjacked service account would not be running more than one service&#8230;  Right?    I could be missing something&#8230;  Thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
